Does the majority of society today think of theatre as a means to both educate and entertain the masses? It seems to me, the value of theatre can become lost in the array of entertainment options available at the touch of a button in today’s society. But are the shows we are watching on TV helping our society to learn about itself; criticize its hypocrisies and praise its advancements?
Bernard Shaw used the medium of theatre to convey his provocative and inquisitive messages to a greater audience. Placing this satirical evaluation within a candy-coated ‘experiential’ outing, Shaw slipped in some rather challenging, if not for some, even troublesome queries regarding equality, feminism, wealth, status, the implications of war, patriotism and so much more. The modern-day ‘date night’ at the theatre has the potential to change the course of one’s opinion, which today is a much more empowered method of communication than in years’ past. From their seat in the theatre, an audience member can formulate an opinion and send it out using their phone to thousands of people via Facebook, Twitter, and many other forums.
Ideas are being shared that question our systems of community, our understanding of ourselves in the present as educated through the past. TV may be the best form of entertainment when you need to shut your brain off after a long day of work, but educating oneself through entertainment needs that aspect of real life that theatre provides. It needs the actors to potentially make a mistake, for the orchestra to miss a note, for an audience member to sneeze at a highly critical moment in the play. The reality of theatre conveys its messages to an engaged audience of viewers, who are not passively accepting entertainment, but are critically evaluating the thoughts being communicated to them. It seems to me, the audience is truly participating in the building of those messages through their attendance of a performance.
The audience member’s opinion, constructed from the provocation of ideas from playwrights as Shaw, finds its place in history as a documentable assertion of one’s beliefs. The opinion travels, worldwide through tweets and shares. It is moulded, changed; added to and adapted in so many ways by society. As it travels, its meaning is as changed as it would be if it was a message conveyed through the game ‘Telephone.’ And yet, as a ‘professional communicator,’ I think Bernard Shaw would accept and encourage this rapid transfer of knowledge, even with the inherent flaws of social media.
What are your thoughts?
























I had the pleasure of sitting in on a discussion with Leonard Connelly and some fifty theatre goers who saw the show during the Education Department’s August Seminar. The attendees talked over one another in excitement, they could not stop discussing this play’s themes, symbols and metaphors; the fish and its meaning in Christianity, the repetition of similar acts throughout the years, the chairs with dates marked ever so subtly on their backs, the postcards…